Senior sucht ihn - contesosigh

Wann ist am Montag Sprechstunde? (Question structure)

These practices are built on a history of racism, white supremacy, and oppression. Maybe the Trumpsters did take a single message away from the 2018 election.

In sentences like Es ist Winter and Es ist jetzt Winter, Winter is still the subject, and es merely keeps the finite verb in the second position. Wenn sich dein Freundeskreis im Laufe der Jahre immer stärker verkleinert hat oder du gerade erst in eine neue Stadt gezogen bist, kannst du hier vielleicht auch neue Männer für eine Freundschaft treffen.

Company News - The conventional wisdom about Trump's approval rating is that they're stubborn and barely budge.

I have no problem with the answer, but I can not understand the structure of the question, as I would've expected it to be: Wann ist Senior sucht ihn am Montag. For I understand that Sprechstunde is the subject there and am Montag is a time adverbial. I appreciate your help with this one. Two more: Wann passieren im Straßenverkehr gewönlich die meisten Unfälle. Wo existieren nach heutigem Wissensstand die größten Erdölvorräte. In your opening post, you wondered why that option had not been used. Well, it's an option, nothing more. Thank you, Schimmelreiter, I appreciate your taking the time to post back and further explain things to me. But so far I have understood that to be an option, not, but rather the norm for forming questions; for I read that subjects should be placed closest to verbs. However, and now that I know that placement of adverbials right after the verb and before the subject is possible, how does it differ from the traditional, English-like, post-subject positioning. Viele Dank für Ihre Zeite und Ihre Antwort. You want to be clear that your question is specifically about Monday on Tuesday the Spechstunde might be at another time. In most cases, this is the answer to word order questions. As a case inflected language, German has higher degree of flexibility in word order compared to other modern European language and this flexibility is generally used to put emphasis on certain parts of the sentence. Generally, the part moved forward in the sentence compared to neutral word order is the emphasized one. I must say it depends. If you do not want to change the meaning, Bernd's explanation is correct. And I think it is what you meant. I corrected the spelling error, too. The problem is here that it changes the meaning. His girl friend is searching Paul. His is not well-defined in this sentence. It refers to another person than Paul. The problem is that nominative and accusative happen to be morphologically indistinguishable. It is simply a bad example. Let Paul look for his male rather than his female friend and the confusion disappears: Wann sucht Paul seinen Freund. Wann sucht seinen Freund Paul. The Quiz master asks Wann sucht seinen Freund picking a paper out of a box, reading and continuing - Paul. In written language: Wann sucht seinen Freund: Paul. Senior sucht ihn syntactical structure is If the subject appears after the finite verb then it has to follow the verb immediately. You cannot move the accusative object in between. This rule applies to pronoun or noun subjects alike. I am not aware of any exceptions senior sucht ihn that rule. Hi, Bernd what about: Wann sucht ihn sein Freund. Wann sucht sein Freund ihn. According to your rule, only the last is correct. But I feel the first is the default. At least it is correct and contradicts your rule. The syntactical structure is If the subject appears after the finite verb then it has to follow the verb immediately. You cannot move the accusative object in between. This rule applies to pronoun or noun subjects alike. I am not aware of any exceptions to that rule. The examples they give for the basic word order change indeed only demonstrate the Mittelfeld superiority of the pronouns closest to the verb at the beginning. However, does that mean this is the only type of exception. In the second case, the predicative being in last position seems pretty clear. I am not sure how else to clarify that for you given this is what you called it. I have another exception, professions with articles regionally also names with articles, in the northern area names with articles are often considered as bad language. Wann besucht der Schneider den Schuster. Wann besucht den Schuster der Schneider. Wann trifft den Hans der Pfeil. Wann trifft der Pfeil den Hans. Wann holt den Meier endlich der Teufel. Wann stach den Professor eine Biene. The canoo entry senior sucht ihn support your argument that there are subject-less sentences with predicative nouns. The very concept of the predicative noun presupposes the existence of a verb that couples the subject and the predicative noun, hence copula verb. Unless there's a subject, there's nothing for the predicative noun to copula -te with. To distinguish between subject and predicative now, you have to ask: Is the now part of the statement you are making or is it the thing the statement is about. Here es is not needed since the adverb keeps the finite verb in the second position anyway. In line with Duden, sein is roughly equivalent to stattfinden: Jetzt findet Winter statt. Jetzt ist die erste Vorlesung. So in Jetzt ist Winter, Winter is clearly the subject. In sentences like Es ist Winter and Es ist jetzt Winter, Winter is still the subject, and es merely keeps the finite verb in the second position. The dummy subject senior sucht ihn to be required in Jetzt ist es sechs Uhr whereas there's no es in Jetzt ist Winter. This shows that es is a dummy subject in Es ist sechs Uhr whereas es merely keeps the verb in the second position of Es ist Winter: As soon as you substitute jetzt for es, there's no need for it anymore. senior sucht ihn I really don't know why you didn't say that at the beginning when I first asked, when I explicitely said I'd thought of Sprechstunde as subject and am Montag as time adverbial. I really don't know why you didn't say that at the beginning when I first asked, when I explicitely said I'd thought of Sprechstunde as subject and am Montag as time adverbial. I have been thinking a bit more about it and I think I overstepped. You can rephrase the sentence in such a way that Sprechstunde is undoubtedly a subject and it is still possible to place the adverbial between verb and subject: Wann findet am Montag die Sprechstunde statt. That predicative noun explanation you brought our attentions to quite reasoned with me - it makes sense. There is no subject in that question - it's what we're asking about with wann. For example: Da ist der Bus. This structure is simply inverted form Der Bus ist da. Question form: Wo ist der Bus Likewise, Am Montag Sprechstunde ist von 9:00 bis 13:00. Inverted form: Von 9:00 bis 13:00 ist Am Montag Sprechstunde. Question: Wann ist Am Montag Sprechstunde. Which leaves me only confused about Am Montag: it looked like adverb to me, so I kind of excluded the whole explanation - unless, of course, it's functioning there as an adjectival phrase for Sprestunde, which makes that sentence as good and right as any. Wann ist Am Montag Sprechstunde. If used attributively, it is placed after the noun it modifies: Die Sprechstunde am Montag ist von 9 Uhr bis 13 Uhr. If modifying the predicate, it can senior sucht ihn placed in these positions bold-faced constituents are especially emphasised. Am Montag ist die Sprechstunde von 9 Uhr bis 13 Uhr. Die Sprechstunde ist am Montag von 9 Uhr bis 13 Uhr. Die Sprechstunde ist von 9 Uhr bis 13 Uhr am Montag. You might form a compound noun: Die Montagssprechstunde ist von 9 Uhr bis 13 Uhr. The linking s is debatable. You might form an adjective: Die montägliche S prechstunde ist von 9 Uhr bis 13 Uhr. I advise against both the compound noun and the adjective. The whole statement is inverted form. Please bear with me guys, I know much has been said here, but I still have something to add. I have thought of another perspective for viewing that sentence, and that is it's asking about a subject - a time subject: Wann ist am Montag Sprechstunde. It's asking about the clinic time wann which is at Monday ist am Montag : Wann ist am Montag: when is at Monday. Sprechstunde at the end complements the predicate sein: Sprecstunde sein - but it's not itself the subject for that question the fact there is no article before it further supports that, I guess Vielen Dank. Wann ist am Montag Sprechstunde vs. The latter shows more clearly that Sprechstunde is the subject. You mentioned stattfinden as an equivalent of sein in this case, but I think you can only say wann findet die Sprechstunde senior sucht ihn, and not wann findet Sprechstunde statt. I am therefore not sure at 100% that in wann ist. Sprechstunde, the final word is a real subject. An analogy between es ist jetzt sonnig and es ist jetzt Sprechstunde confuses me I know that you will probably say that es only serves to keep the verb in 2nd position, and nevertheless. Alright, Hutschi, wann ist die Sprechstunde am Montag is more standardlike. But this does not solve the doubt I expressed in 38. And that increases my doubt on the real function of 'Sprechstunde' : more predicate than subject. It is a question of grammatical analysis. Sprechstunde sein - this may be a verb phrase. Die Sprechstunde ist am Montag. Here it is fuzzy whether it is subject or part of the predicate. Compare: Der Montag ist Sprechstunde. So, Wann - interrogative adverb ist - verb am Montag - adverbial Sprechstunde - subject. Normal word order in German places the predicative as the very last element in the Mittelfeld, or even part of the sentence bracket. Hence, the subject is the element that has to move as you add more and more elements to the sentence. Owing to the absence of the article, the function of 'Sprechstunde' becomes uncertain and more similar to that of an adjective possibly used a sort of prefixin my view. On the other hand, I admit that in the case of. By contrast, in Es sind Ferien, Ferien is the subject, so es, which is a mere placeholder, isn't needed anymore when you put jetzt into the prefield: Jetzt sind Ferien. So, pace Gernot, yours is a comparison of the apples-and-oranges type. In es is the subject. By contrast, in Es sind Ferien, Ferien is the subject, so es, which is a mere placeholder, isn't needed anymore when you put jetzt into the prefield: Jetzt sind Ferien. No, ' es'is the zero-subject here and Ferien is part of the predicate. The fact that you can and even must leave 'es' out when you use another phrase in senior sucht ihn first position is completely irrelevant. In German, we call the predicate. This idea corresponds very much to that of the The topic or theme is that part of the sentence to which we want to add information dasjenige worüber wir eine Aussage treffen möchten In the case of The case of best exemplifies the subject—topic subject—theme distinction. In these sentences the topic is never the subject, but is determined. In 6 the topic is the whole expressed by the sentence i. In 8 it is arguably the equality in length of the day and night in some day senior sucht ihn than the day itself.

Senior sucht Sex - Leseprobe 6 - AUTOR SUCHT LESER ...
I am therefore not sure at 100% that in wann ist. His girl friend is searching Paul. There is no subject in that question - it's what we're asking about with wann. I corrected the spelling error, too. Sprechstunde, the final word is a real subject. In 8 it is arguably the equality in length of the day and night in some day rather than the day itself. Nixon's average approval rating, 59 percent, was also quite high relative to Trump's. I must say it depends. One of the of Donald Trump's presidency has been his approval rating. Hallo liebe Männer Ich versuche es hier dich zu finden, sofern dich gibt und auch du suchst eine feste und ehrliche Beziehung. Wann trifft den Hans der Pfeil?